React Native was developed by Facebook and Flutter was created by Google. These are two hot cross-platform app development technologies that have been around for a while and are trending. This article will focus on both of them in detail from a developer’s hindsight.
Due to the increasing demand for mobile apps almost every company requires a mobile app to stay competitive and thrive in the market. Additionally, companies are searching for an option to develop mobile apps specifically for Android and iOS that have faster speed and even lesser resources.
Apple and Google have also offered technologies and native tools to build apps. Android developers utilize Android Studio and Kotlin/Java to build apps while iOS utilizes Xcode and Swift. This is something that requires developers to learn two different kinds of technologies. Hence, some companies have adopted cross-platform solutions over native solutions to develop apps for both Android and iOS.
Before we deconstruct the technical and business case differences between Flutter and React Native, let’s discuss which is better suited for different cases.
Introducing React Native
The primary difference between developing mobile apps and browser-based apps in React Native and React is that in React, virtual DOM is utilized to change browser code in Reactjs. However, in React native APIs are used to change the components in the mobile. The code blends with a different environment.
The rest of the process is quite similar to each other. An experienced react native developer in React will turn the pattern of props, HOCs, and lifecycle, and render props towards the React Native. The main rules are similar. Instead of a browser, they will have to learn how to refocus for an iOS or Android environment.
There are many advantages that the similarities between the two libraries provide. There are way more than the react native developers with experience in one library are quickly able to learn the certainties of the other. The most popular front-end development technology is React at the moment and we will go more into detail about it.
Key React Native Facts
- It is an open-source library built for mobile development launched by Facebook
- Launched in 2015.
- JS native.
Flutter (and Dart)
Flutter is a mobile UI-framework which is also an open-source technology that was originally developed by Google and it also maintains it. It was launched in 2018 and was purchased out of beta in January 2019. Google has also developed Angular, the market version of the non-mobile development market called ReactJS. From this point onwards, the similarities between Angular and Flutter end.
Dart is easier to read and understand than JS and various programming languages due to its syntax being similar to that of a human language. It uses more options but fewer commands. Developers are allowed to choose their names for variables making the code easier and more understandable to themselves. In the case of the multiple projects that devs work on this detour from standardization needs to be considered carefully.
Flutter app development converts Dart to binary code that matches the scalability of the native performance of Swift, Kotlin, Objective-C, or Java. Flutter is inspired by the success of React that crossed its Angular framework in popularity. Flutter developer builds its UI based on widgets. Widgets are changed only when it is necessary, generally when their version has been changed that resembles React’s virtual Dom.
Key Flutter Facts
- Flutter was launched and maintained by Google and is an open-source library for mobile development.
- Launched in 2018 and taken out of beta in January 2019.
- It is X-Compiled i.e., communicates with mobile devices natively.
- It is a kind of cross-platform technology that is used to build ‘almost native’ Android and iOS mobile apps.
The main advantage of utilizing a cross-platform mobile app development technology is the skill to create apps for both Android and iOS using a single programming language.
2. Flutter — Dart
It is very important to keep in mind the technical structure of any cross-platform framework for mobile app development. By understanding the basics of the framework, we can point out a decision and select the one that is the best for the project.
1. Flutter — Skia
It works on the Dart system in which the majority of the elements are inbuilt hence it’s bigger and does not need the medium to interact with the native components. There are many frameworks in Dart like Cupertino and Material Design that are stuffed inside and provide all the necessary technologies to build mobile apps for the flutter developer. The Dart framework contains a Skia C++ engine that has every channel, composition, and protocol. This means that Flutter encapsulates everything needed for Flutter app development.
2. Flux – React Native
The configuration stages must be straightforward and simple so that it can be easily understood by the developers that are starting with it.
1. React Native — NPM
Flutter — File installation from Source
You can install Flutter by installing the file for a particular system from Github. You can load the zip file of flutter and incorporate it as a PATH system.
Flutter needs to better the configuration process by helping package systems such as MacPorts, APT, Homebrew, YUM, etc so that there would be no need for the users to execute additional processes while installation.
Analysis & Result
Flutter and React Native: Technical performance and quality
Both these technologies are great choices when it comes to the creation of cross-platform apps to perform on both Android and iOS platforms. Both of them are amazing mobile development tools for iOS and Android.
However, how do these two frameworks differ in technical qualities and their weaknesses and strengths? If mobile applications developed in the two different parameters can have variations in performance and other metrics like response time then which one would be better?
Similarities between Flutter and React Native
- Every legendary rivalry first has a lot of things in common. If not then there would not be a healthy competition. React Native and Flutter are no exceptions to that. Before differentiating them we should first look at the similarities that they share on which their rivalry is driven by.
- They are used to develop cross-platform and great-performing apps through just a single code base.
- They do not use the web tools but their native elements and 2D graphics system to form their user interface.
- Apps developed by both these technologies are almost difficult to differentiate as native options.
- Both of them are extremely flexible as they do not have platform-specific design restrictions.
- Both of these frameworks are based on Reactjs technology.
React Native and Flutter – Cross-Platform Mobile Development Systems
The most extreme similarity in these two platforms and the reason why programmers generally select either of them is that both of them are world-class cross-platform app creation tools.
Both these frameworks create applications that work well on both iOS and Android. When it comes to interaction with both the mobile OSs, there are some specifics. However, almost 90% of similar types of programming codebase are put to use in both the operating systems.
Native Mobile Apps Vs Cross-Platform
Inbuilt apps are programmed to function on a specific operating system. When it comes to the mobile development industry it is divided widely between Android that has 75% of the mobile market or iOS which boasts 24% of these apps. Inbuilt iOS apps are scripted in Swift or Objective-C languages but native Android apps are crafted in either Kotlin or Java.
Native Mobile Development
The biggest merit of this mobile creation is the ability to use a device’s hardware like GPS and camera. These tools can also be used by cross-platform apps but not without using plugins. Even if this won’t affect the user experience widely but use of an extra layer aids to the complications. This aids the threat of bugs, glitches, and failures which is not quite performance-centric.
It is also much more convenient to get an approved native app on the App Store and Play Store.
Of late, there was a relatively better performance seen by native mobile development. Most of such gaps have almost been sealed by Flutter and React Native, although there are still many performance edges to native development.
Native Mobile Development advantages
- Bug fixes can be done more conveniently in native applications.
- Hardware features like GPS, camera, etc., are much easier to use.
- As there are many preloaded elements and the code simply means that the native apps provide optimal performance and speed.
- Compared to its alternatives, native apps perform better offline. This is also due to the pre-loaded elements. For instance, native app development will be more suited to a media or online magazine. As once new information is uploaded, there are minimal chances of problems if the visitor is offline in any circumstances like disrupted broadband or no internet at all.
- It’s much easier to approve a native app in any App Store.
Native Mobile Development downside
- You need to develop two apps wflutteith new codes and maintain two different operating mobile platforms.
- This distinctiveness between two mobile apps means more money and time to be spent in maintaining and developing them. It leaves you with reduced time to market.
Cross-Platform App Development
React and Flutter are quite close to performing just like their native counterpart. Also, the benefits of these cross-platform apps are far more than its downsides.
This is proven by these mobile apps:
- Google Ads
- Google Stadia
Cross-Platform Development Benefits
- Reusable components –Most of the code files are similar used on both the platforms.
- Less Expensive – you do not have to develop two separate apps that require two different developer’s set of skills.
- Performance – due to the prevalence of Flutter and React Native, there are very few inconsistencies in performance and speed.
- Time to promote – the similarity in coding system in both Android and iOS means that newer apps and releases can be introduced easily and quickly compared to creating two 2 different native options.
Cross-Platform Development Drawbacks
- Offline performance – it is quite tough to create a cross-platform app that works equally well offline also like a native app.
- More difficult development and compilation – it is less time consuming to create a cross-platform app compared to developing two native apps. But it is more time-consuming to create one cross-platform compared to a native app. It should be known that 90% of the shared codebase is adapted for both OS platforms. The other 10% that differs needs to be done perfectly to integrate it into both iOS and Android if there need to be no issues regarding speed and performance.
- Authorization on App Stores – it takes longer for both the app stores to accept a cross-platform app. There also needs to be the authorization of every new update. This takes longer as well hence, it can cost thee app a lot.
Differences between Flutter Vs React Native
Let’s take a look at the attributes that keep these two technologies apart:
Mobile applications that are developed via Flutter are known as Cross Compiled apps. It means the language it is written grants them to interact ‘natively’ with both the mobile platforms and also with the hardware of the handheld tools.
It can harm the working of Flutter vs React Native applications based on more complex apps. It is especially true when a device’s hardware’s communication is of more significance.
Flutter and React Native are exceptional cross-platform mobile development toolkits. Both of them have their advantages and disadvantages that roughly cancel out each other in a bigger picture. Based on specifics, Flutter app development is better than React if an application has communication with a mobile device’s underlying hardware. It is also the perfect toolkit that contains everything needed for mobile application development from the scratch. It is also quicker and easier to develop as it contains a components library, Material Design principle, and useful widgets.
All product and company names are trademarks™, registered® or copyright© trademarks of their respective holders. Use of them does not imply any affiliation with or endorsement by them.